10/19/26 - Teachers LOVE my new $ 89 forever subscription option. No renewals, no recurring fees, just an incomparable library of engagement and indispensable materials, including my new 2.0 versions of classic games like Tony Fraction, Cash Out, Place Value Pirates, Horrendous Soup and others. It's the best value in education and pays for itself instantly. By the way, we just streamlined registration. It takes less 30 seconds!

Advertisement

Remove ad

This article provides a brief overview of the similarities and differences between enslaved people and indentured servants.

Slavery in Colonial America

An Overseer Doing His Duty (1798), Benjamin Henry Latrobe

Slavery and Indentured Servitude in Colonial America

The labor force of colonial America was shaped by two very different systems of bound labor: slavery and indentured servitude. Although both involved people working under harsh conditions with limited freedom, the two systems differed greatly in legal status, length of service, treatment, and the possibility of eventual freedom.

Origins and Legal Status

By the later colonial period, slavery in British North America had developed into a race-based and hereditary system in which enslaved people, primarily of African descent, were treated as property and could be forced to labor for life. Their children could also inherit enslaved status. Indentured servitude, by contrast, was based on a contract. Many indentured servants were Europeans who agreed to work for a set number of years, often in exchange for passage across the Atlantic, food, housing, or other benefits. Once their contracts ended, they were legally free.

Conditions of Labor

Both enslaved people and indentured servants could face exhausting labor, harsh discipline, poor living conditions, and abuse. The most important difference was that slavery was generally permanent, while indentured servitude was temporary. Enslaved people could be forced to work for life, while indentured servants had a defined period of service, even though those years could still be extremely difficult.

Legal Protections and Rights

Enslaved people were denied many basic legal rights and were increasingly treated under colonial law as property. They could be bought, sold, transferred, and separated from family members. Indentured servants had more legal recognition because their service was governed by contracts. In theory, they could appeal to courts if masters violated the terms of those agreements, although in practice servants often had limited power and could still suffer serious abuse.

Prospects for Freedom

The greatest difference between the two systems was the possibility of freedom. Enslaved people generally faced lifelong bondage, and only a small percentage obtained freedom through manumission, escape, military service, or legal action. Indentured servants, however, were expected to become free once they completed their contracts. Some received money, clothing, land, or other "freedom dues," although many still faced economic hardship after their period of service ended.

Why it mattered: Indentured servitude and slavery both supplied labor to the growing colonies, but they developed into very different institutions. Over time, hereditary racial slavery became deeply embedded in the economy and society of several colonies, especially in the South.

13 Colonies Navigation

Other 13 Colonies Articles

Advertisement

Remove ad

Related activities

Advertisement

Remove ad